New license request

2014-03-05 Thread Fendt, Oliver
Hi all, We have found a license which is currently not available in the SPDX license list and I did not find it in the list licenses under consideration, due to this I want to request that it will be included in the SPDX license list. Please find below the required information for inclusion.

Re: New License Request

2014-03-05 Thread Mike Milinkovich
On 05/03/2014 11:56 AM, J Lovejoy wrote: If you have any other questions, please do not hesitate to ask! That's fine. "BSD-3-Clause" is a perfectly good answer. Thanks everyone for all the help! -- Mike Milinkovich

RE: Fedora License List Review

2014-03-05 Thread zwhite
Quick reminder to the group: please submit your feedback on the matter of adding the below-identified licenses to the SPDX License List. Your timely submissions will allow us to discuss outstanding issues at tomorrow's bi-weekly Legal Team call. Thanks!Zak WhiteEntente Software LLC570 El Camino

RE: New license request

2014-03-05 Thread Tom Incorvia
Hello Fendt, I have been out of the SPDX mix for a while, but I believe that this license would not be considered an open source license based on the OSI criteriahttp://opensource.org/osd-annotated - this license is used by Microsoft for certain free distributions (for instance, the Microsoft

Re: New license request

2014-03-05 Thread J Lovejoy
Hi Oliver, Tom, Just to clarify on Tom’s points - the normal process is to review based on the OSD as a starting point, although for a license to be on the SPDX License List, it does not need to strictly adhere to the OSD (see more info here, in particular, the bit under “Candidate License