HI All,
Having a bit of a hard time following this, as I think Rob may have confused
who was speaking on which organization’s behalf (Richard is coming from the OSI
perspective, here)
Correct me if I’m wrong, but the suggestion seems to be:
OSI has now posted the "Free Public License 1.0.0"
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 07:30:18PM +, J Lovejoy wrote:
> Correct me if I’m wrong, but the suggestion seems to be:
>
> OSI has now posted the "Free Public License 1.0.0" and wants to use the short
> identifier FPL-1.0.0
Well that identifier (or something else that bears some similarity to
