Re: New License/Exception Request: BTC License (BTC)

I can change something insignificant if it helps, but this seemed better On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:03 AM Josh Habdas wrote: > It's the exact same, in fact. Save for the copyright line. And here's why > this new license is important: > > >

Re: New License/Exception Request: BTC License (BTC)

It's the exact same, in fact. Save for the copyright line. And here's why this new license is important: https://medium.com/@jhabdas/introducing-the-btc-license-28650887eb11?source=linkShare-d4a43ea991d3-1499277791 On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 1:57 AM Richard Fontana wrote: >

Re: New License/Exception Request: BTC License (BTC)

This seems to be equivalent to the ISC license from an SPDX point of view (see https://spdx.org/spdx-license-list/matching-guidelines: " Ignore copyright notices. A copyright notice consists of the following elements, for example: "2012 Copyright, John Doe. All rights reserved." or "(c) 2012

New License/Exception Request: BTC License (BTC)

For consideration during the next SPDX Legal Team meeting. *Full name:* BTC License *Identifier:* BTC *URL:* https://gist.github.com/jhabdas/9fc645415bf277e3a1f3bc5c04083f01 *OSI:* Not OSI-submitted nor approved *Explanation: