> On Sep 29, 2018, at 4:00 PM, Kyle Mitchell wrote:
>
> This interests me also.
>
> It's my impression, from both the license-list explanation
> and the actual list, that SPDX casts a broader net than
> either OSI or FSF. Substantial compliance is sufficient.
correct. SPDX’s goal is to creat
> On Sep 30, 2018, at 8:18 AM, Philippe Ombredanne wrote:
>
> Mike:
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 9:45 PM Mike Linksvayer wrote:
>> I did not know license list candidates must have the general attributes of
>> an "open source" license, but I'm glad to learn of the requirement.
>> I wonder how th
Mike:
On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 9:45 PM Mike Linksvayer wrote:
> I did not know license list candidates must have the general attributes of an
> "open source" license, but I'm glad to learn of the requirement.
> I wonder how the CC NC and ND licenses made it through (I searched the list
> archives
