On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 10:58 -0700, Gary O'Neall wrote:
> We spent quite a bit of time discussing snippets in the SPDX
> technical working group. There are definitely a number of issues and
> considerations.
>
> At the conclusion of the discussions, there was a consensus that
> denoting snippets i
We spent quite a bit of time discussing snippets in the SPDX technical working
group. There are definitely a number of issues and considerations.
At the conclusion of the discussions, there was a consensus that denoting
snippets in an SPDX document was required for several use cases and was a
On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 16:15 +0200, Max Mehl wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> At REUSE, we currently discuss how to correctly handling snippets
> from a third party, potentially under a different license [^1]. Since
> we strive to make as much use of SPDX as possible, I wonder about how
> you would solve this.
Hi all,
At REUSE, we currently discuss how to correctly handling snippets from a
third party, potentially under a different license [^1]. Since we strive
to make as much use of SPDX as possible, I wonder about how you would
solve this.
I saw that SPDX uses the following tags instead of FileCopyri
