Re: SPDX License List license inclusion guidelines

Philippe, I agree with you but I think it is orthogonal, the SPDX license inclusion guidelines would govern what goes in the official SPDX license namespace, it does not restrict what could go into other license namespaces (which would be implemented by the other proposal currently being disc

Re: update to documentation, use of wiki

While I am biased, GitHub issues are pretty useful and some of these scenarios are pretty well handled with issues and it gives people one place to look for content. For example, we could create an spdx-meetings repository, create an issue to capture the notes from each meeting (you can use mar

Re: [spdx-tech] Advice/guidance/input from the SPDX community for Arch Linux

whether it means AND or OR). There are a number of parsers out there for this format. Regards, William Bartholomew On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 12:33 PM Santiago Torres Arias wrote: > Hi, > > The Arch Linux community recently started a discussion around adopting > SPDX license identifiers

Re: [spdx-tech] matching guidelines updates

During the discussion about SPDX 3.0 and positioning SPDX as an option for the various SBoM efforts that are going on, one of the discussion points was about making the specification more digestible by moving content that is secondary to the format of an SPDX document out of the specification and i