Re: Artistic-2.0 derivative - npm License

2022-05-02 Thread Till Jaeger via lists.spdx.org
Am 02.05.22 um 13:43 schrieb Philippe Ombredanne: Hi Till: You have eagle eyes! On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 10:46 AM Till Jaeger via lists.spdx.org wrote: I noticed that NPM is using an Artistic-2.0 with additional terms and conditions: This is IMHO a total and complete mess and non-sense, eve

Re: Artistic-2.0 derivative - npm License

2022-05-02 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Philippe Ombredanne (2022-05-02 13:43:56) > On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 10:46 AM Till Jaeger via lists.spdx.org > wrote: > > I noticed that NPM is using an Artistic-2.0 with additional terms > > and conditions: > > This is IMHO a total and complete mess and non-sense, eventually non > FOSS a

Re: Artistic-2.0 derivative - npm License

2022-05-02 Thread Philippe Ombredanne
Hi Till: You have eagle eyes! On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 10:46 AM Till Jaeger via lists.spdx.org wrote: > I noticed that NPM is using an Artistic-2.0 with additional terms and > conditions: This is IMHO a total and complete mess and non-sense, eventually non FOSS at all. Anyone from Microsoft or Git

Artistic-2.0 derivative - npm License

2022-05-02 Thread Till Jaeger via lists.spdx.org
Hi all, I noticed that NPM is using an Artistic-2.0 with additional terms and conditions: - npm License Copyright (c) npm, Inc. and Contributors All rights reserved. npm is released under the Artistic License 2.0, subject to additional terms that are listed below. The text of