On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 09:20:54AM -0800, g...@sourceauditor.com wrote:
> If we were to update the license matching guidelines to explicitly
> ignore these, the tools could skip them without having to add the
> alt and/or optional tags to the license XMLs.

Alt/optional aren't all that difficult, and we need them anyway for
variations in potentially-substantive text.  I'm in favor of
continuing to use them explicitly in the XML for this case, and would
like to see us gradually *reduce* the size of the matching guidelines
[1].  A handful of [2]:

  <p>Bootloader Exception<alt match="-*" name="titleUnderline"/></p>

and similar in our XML doesn't seem like it would be hard to add,
review, or maintain.  And by not special-casing this issue, we make
life easier on folks implementing matching tools, since they have one
fewer guideline to handle.

Cheers,
Trevor

[1]: https://spdx.org/spdx-license-list/matching-guidelines
[2]: 
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/blob/v3.0/src/exceptions/Bootloader-exception.xml#L9

-- 
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Spdx-legal mailing list
Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal

Reply via email to