heeler
-Original Message-
From: spdx-legal-boun...@lists.spdx.org
[mailto:spdx-legal-boun...@lists.spdx.org] On Behalf Of Kyle E. Mitchell
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 1:23 PM
To: Gisi, Mark
Cc: spdx-t...@fossbazaar.org; spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org
Subject: Re: [Bug 1292] New: What is the
lto:spdx-tech-boun...@lists.spdx.org] On Behalf Of Kyle E. Mitchell
> Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 12:01 PM
> To: Sam Ellis
> Cc: spdx-t...@fossbazaar.org; spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org
> Subject: Re: [Bug 1292] New: What is the correct license expression for a
> project with an addition
-legal@lists.spdx.org
Subject: Re: [Bug 1292] New: What is the correct license expression for a
project with an additional patent license?
Many thanks for your generous reply, and for sending so quickly.
Forgive me if I'm behind on general discussions about the purpose and function
of SPDX e
Many thanks for your generous reply, and for sending so quickly.
Forgive me if I'm behind on general discussions about the purpose and
function of SPDX expressions. I understood their purpose rather more as
a coding system for what terms purportedly apply than a way to state a
fully formed legal c
> Subject: [Bug 1292] New: What is the correct license expression for a project
> with an additional patent license?
> https://bugs.linuxfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1292
I will take the opportunity to offer an opinion to the forums on this question
that is raised above:
I think first and f
