versioning of license list

2022-04-28 Thread J Lovejoy
Hi all, As I was adding milestones to the Github repo for the next couple releases, I wondered... do we just keep going with 3.18, 3.19, 3.20... (and 3.20 looks a lot like 3.2, but I guess that was also the case with 3.10 and it wasn't an issue)? We only have changed the major number when th

Re: versioning of license list

2022-04-28 Thread Alan Tse via lists.spdx.org
<https://github.com/semantic-release/semantic-release> to automatically make the next version with a changelog. From: on behalf of J Lovejoy Date: Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 10:55 AM To: "Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org" Subject: versioning of license list CAUTION: This email orig

Re: versioning of license list

2022-04-28 Thread Sebastian Crane
Dear Jilayne, > We only have changed the major number when there was a major change - adding > license expression operators for 2.0; changing to XML format and major > change to GNU identifiers or 3.0. I don't really foresee a major change of > that nature on the horizon (good!). This would mean w

Re: versioning of license list

2022-04-28 Thread Steve Winslow
Thanks all! One note just for consideration here: the version numbering for the License List has at least a syntactic meaning also within the spec itself, for SPDX documents: see https://spdx.github.io/spdx-spec/document-creation-information/#67-license-list-version-field That defines it as a "M

Re: versioning of license list

2022-04-29 Thread Bastien
Hi Steve, "Steve Winslow" writes: > So I'd be inclined to stick with the current M.N format for now, and > keep incrementing 3.x unless and until we hit a significant enough > change to bump it to 4.0. +1 -- semver is not really useful here, and 3.20 looks perfectly fine in the eyes of develope

Re: versioning of license list

2022-04-29 Thread Warner Losh
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 3:28 AM Bastien wrote: > Hi Steve, > > "Steve Winslow" writes: > > > So I'd be inclined to stick with the current M.N format for now, and > > keep incrementing 3.x unless and until we hit a significant enough > > change to bump it to 4.0. > > +1 -- semver is not really us

Re: versioning of license list

2022-05-03 Thread J Lovejoy
Thanks all for the confirmation to keep on keepin’ on with our current mode, then! J. > On Apr 29, 2022, at 7:25 AM, Warner Losh wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 3:28 AM Bastien > wrote: > Hi Steve, > > "Steve Winslow" mailto:swins...@gmail.com>> w