This sounds appealing to me (if I'm understanding it correctly). From
Red Hat's perspective one of the great impracticalities of SPDX has
been that, after many years of SPDX's existence, its adopted
identifiers still represent only a small portion of the licenses
encountered in much of the the soft
Hi Jilayne:
On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 6:40 PM J Lovejoy wrote:
> Hi Philippe,
> I’m a bit lost on what the goal of this is. Can you provide a bit more
> context.
>
> I looked at a couple entries and noticed, for example, this one:
> https://github.com/nexB/spdx-license-namespaces-registry/blob/maste
