[spdx-tech] Question on how to handle "None" and "NoAssertion"

Hi Sean - and the larger SPDX tech community, I would like to get your opinion on how we should handle the NoAssertion and None object values for several SPDX properties. The issues are documented in https://github.com/spdx/spdx-3-model/issues/76 and https://github.com/spdx/spdx-3-model

[Bug 1289] Any reason "NONE" and "NOASSERTION" are not valid licenses as per Appendix IV?

https://bugs.linuxfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1289 Kate Stewart changed: What|Removed |Added CC||stew...@linux.com

[Bug 1289] Any reason NONE and NOASSERTION are not valid licenses as per Appendix IV?

https://bugs.linuxfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1289 --- Comment #2 from Joe Andrieu j...@andrieu.net 2015-06-16 19:56:58 UTC --- Mark, Thanks for the clarification. In the case of Sections 3.12 and 3.13, it is easy to agree with your argument that NONE and ASSERTION are a state of analysis

[Bug 1289] New: Any reason NONE and NOASSERTION are not valid licenses as per Appendix IV?

https://bugs.linuxfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1289 Bug #: 1289 Summary: Any reason NONE and NOASSERTION are not valid licenses as per Appendix IV? Product: SPDX Version: 2.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All

Re: none

On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 7:47 PM, D M German d...@uvic.ca wrote: * Double braces {{}} One problem I have run into is that {{}} are widely used by wikis and other HTML systems to escape a template of some sort. Try for example editing the following page and changing {{}} to {{ and }}

RE: none

support. Gary -Original Message- From: Philippe Ombredanne [mailto:pombreda...@nexb.com] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 10:42 AM To: spdx-tech@lists.spdx.org Cc: Gary O'Neall; d...@uvic.ca; Jilayne Lovejoy Subject: Re: none On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 7:47 PM, D M German d...@uvic.ca wrote