Hi David,
The idea was to list as columns the things potentially affected by
this change and important enough that we cared. In the end we chose
'URL + public fragment' as the one with the most check marks.
See below my comments; maybe others can correct / fill in the gaps.
On 5-Jun-07, at
Hey Johnny,
Thanks for your clarifications and answers to my questions about [1].
Over the last few days I've been thinking about your Identifier Recycling
proposal[2], in addition to other proposals (Tokens, etc). Assuming I
understand things correctly, it seems as if a hybrid of the
On 6/7/07, David Fuelling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Over the last few days I've been thinking about your Identifier Recycling
proposal[2], in addition to other proposals (Tokens, etc). Assuming I
understand things correctly, it seems as if a hybrid of the public/private
token approach would
Hey Josh,
Thanks for your message and great points. See my thoughts/questions inline.
On 6/7/07, Josh Hoyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/7/07, David Fuelling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Over the last few days I've been thinking about your Identifier
Recycling
proposal[2], in addition to
So sitting up here in Seattle with Drummond and we're chatting about the
Canonical ID approach to the identifier recycling and losing
problem. What I describe below is an example which shows four
identifiers that I use daily, one of them being persistent and that I
know will never be reassigned.
