What are the "few additional common fields"?
On 11/1/07, Josh Hoyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/1/07, David Recordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sorry it took me a few days, but seems alright to me. I think a
> > larger question would be if there should be any material differences
> > wi
On 11/1/07, David Recordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry it took me a few days, but seems alright to me. I think a
> larger question would be if there should be any material differences
> with SREG 1.1 such as adding a few additional common fields.
-1 on adding anything to SREG; that's what
On 1-Nov-07, at 12:06 PM, David Recordon wrote:
> Sorry it took me a few days, but seems alright to me. I think a
> larger question would be if there should be any material
> differences with SREG 1.1 such as adding a few additional common
> fields.
I believe Josh's argument back in April
Sorry it took me a few days, but seems alright to me. I think a
larger question would be if there should be any material differences
with SREG 1.1 such as adding a few additional common fields.
-David
On Oct 26, 2007, at 4:51 PM, Johnny Bufu wrote:
> David, Josh,
>
> Reviving an old thread
