On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 3:56 AM, Martin Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Net::OpenID::Consumer perl library as it currently stands will not
> support PAPE in 1.1-mode messages since the openid.ns. mechanism
> is only used in 2.0 mode. I'd like to change this to use the 2.0 scheme
> in 1.1 (w
The preceding sentence goes:
> The actual extension namespace alias should be determined on a
> per-message basis by the party composing the messages, in such a
> manner as to avoid conflicts between multiple extensions.
Thus the intent of the
>
> For the purposes of this document and when
Formal answer is "no".
I think Vidoop will eventually propose to form a working group on this
eventually, but that is only my guess.
=nat
On 8/13/08, Arshad Khan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does OpenID 2.0 support 'Email Address to URL Transformation (EAUT)?
>
>
>
> There is some info on this p
Does OpenID 2.0 support 'Email Address to URL Transformation (EAUT)?
There is some info on this page of what EAUT is:
http://blog.vidoop.com/archives/139
Has Vidoop developed this outside OpenID 2.0 framework?
Thanks.
Arshad
Nat Sakimura wrote:
> Actially, that interpretation is not right. In draft 3, we have made it
> clear.
>
Draft 3 now seems to say:
For the purposes of this document and when constructing OpenID 1.1
and 2.0 messages, the extension namespace alias SHALL be "pape".
Which now seems to re
