Re: Check out my photos on Facebook

Sorry all. Something weird apparently happened with my FB account Please ignore. On Apr 8, 2009, at 18:29, Hans Granqvist invite+kna44...@facebookmail.com wrote: facebook Hans Granqvist has: 150 friends 7 photos 26 notes 18 wall posts 19 groups Check out my photos on Facebook Hi OpenID

Re: OpenID 3.0

I'm not sure what the new intellectual property policy means as regards to discussing on the mailing lists. Do I implicitly agree to this policy by posting ideas here? Can someone explain? More info at http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg2.html Thanks, Hans On 2/1/08,

Re: Service Key Discovery 1.0

In essence, OpenID is a reaction to (perceived?) complexity, so it's an uphill battle to reference SAML, XRI, or anything that touches on any W3 or OASIS standard effort relating to XML and security, really. So for OpenID, there has to be a simpler, key/value-pair, way of doing what's desired, it

Re: Service Key Discovery 1.0

Interesting idea. Is there a way to do this via an RP- OP SSL handshake? Web apps typically don't have access to SSL private keys, at least in larger deployments. I wonder how your idea reduces network traffic, though. Don't you still have to retrieve the public key, which is likely larger than

Re: Adding fields to SREG (was: Re: SREG namespace URI rollback)

such as adding a few additional common fields. -1 on adding anything to SREG; that's what Attribute Exchange is for. Josh ___ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs -- Hans Granqvist, CTO Phone: +1 (408

Re: OpenID Inline Authentication Extension 1.0 Draft 1

-- Hans Granqvist CTO Phone: +1 (408) 524-1598 http://www.yubico.com/ ___ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs

Re: Web Access Management

Ping demoed OpenID technology at RSA. I hear Novell and IBM are looking at supporting OpenID. Microsoft has said they will in future products. Oracle and CA are following OpenID. So, yes. :-) I'm curious why almost all of these companies are non-existent on the mailing lists. Any

Re: OpenID.net Service Type Namespaces

I think it is a fallacy to embed too much meaning into a namespace URL. Encoding into a URL info like main, sub, and draft versions, plus add extension names and versions, and similar will soon end up with an ever-growing problem of trying to match compatible namespaces in the future. Hans

Re: Canonical list of overly general domains?

Daniel E. Renfer wrote: While I haven't been able to find a good list of domains that meet this requirement, what does everybody think of the idea that if you can't find a DNS entry for the domain part of the trust root then it's not a good candidate for a trust root. Maybe it's just my DNS

Re: Identifier portability: the fundamental issue

Drummond Reed wrote: I think you may have me mistaken for somebody else on the list (. . .) Double-blind anonymity in action? ;) -Hans ___ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs

Re: Identifier portability: the fundamental issue

Chris Drake wrote: There seem to be a lot of people on this list who want to hate and loathe the IdP, and grant all power to the RP. I do not understand this reasoning: our users will select the IdP they trust and like, then they will be using a multitude of possibly hostile RPs thereafter:

Re: Notes From Draft 10

Marius Scurtescu wrote: On 16-Oct-06, at 2:44 PM, Josh Hoyt wrote: On 10/16/06, Recordon, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 6.1 Signed List Algorithm [...] I'm thinking it would make sense to change this algorithm to first alphabetically sort the arguments to make it very clear in terms of