Re: Clarification needed in PAPE spec

2009-06-17 Thread David Recordon
Yeah, it was meant to be included with the value of an empty string. --David On Jun 17, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Andrew Arnott wrote: A space-delimited list of no elements is the empty string. So I'd say (and DNOA is coded such that) it cannot be omitted, but may be empty. -- Andrew Arnott "I [

Re: Clarification needed in PAPE spec

2009-06-17 Thread Andrew Arnott
A space-delimited list of no elements is the empty string. So I'd say (and DNOA is coded such that) it cannot be omitted, but may be empty. -- Andrew Arnott "I [may] not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it." - S. G. Tallentyre On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 a

[specs-pape] Clarification needed in PAPE spec

2009-06-17 Thread John Bradley
The parameter must be included but may have zero URI. I remember discussing if it should be optional, but can't off hand remember the logic in including it with zero URI. Perhaps one of my learned colleagues remembers. John B. On 17-Jun-09, at 1:07 PM, Allen Tom wrote: Another ambiguous p

Clarification needed in PAPE spec

2009-06-17 Thread Allen Tom
Another ambiguous parameter is the openid.pape.preferred_auth_policies request parameter in section 5.1. The first sentence in Section 5.1 says that all the request parameters are mandatory (MUST be included), however the description openid.pape.preferred_auth_policies says that zero policies