No, I am just pointing out that the openid.delegate is not needed by
the RP.
I think documenting the flow this way is simpler, and fulfills the
requirements that I have been seeing on the list.
-- Dick
On 10-Oct-06, at 12:47 AM, Drummond Reed wrote:
> Dick,
>
> While I think I followed most
Dick,
While I think I followed most of what you say here, I'm not sure what the
exact proposal is. Are you proposing to remove the openid:delegate element
in 2.0? And replace it with an indirect identifier request protocol (your
step 3 below)?
=Drummond
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL P
