Hi guys,
somehow I only get sporadic messages from this mailing list (I'll have to
dig through my spam settings, etc, to find out what's going on there), so I
read the various responses on the web archives. Let me try to respond to
them:
- XMLDSIG vs. other kinds of signatures: This is exactly
Why dont you implement proof of concept for XRD instead? We can then
formalize it. Why should we wait for XRI TC? After 11 years XRI TC cant even
sign an XML document reliably.
A proof-of-concept is useful for showing that something is
*possible*, but if you try to formalize from there it's
[+gene...@openid.net for a broader audience]
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Dirk Balfanz balf...@google.com wrote:
Hi guys,
Google would like to launch a feature in which we're allowing our Google
Apps hosted domains to become OpenID providers. The authentication part of
it is pretty simple
+1 to http://experimental.openid.net
It would be good to add this to the repository work Breno and John are
doing as having a registry for experimental URIs would be good as well.
Thanks,
George
Dirk Balfanz wrote:
[+gene...@openid.net mailto:gene...@openid.net for a broader audience]
On
Should this experimental namespace only apply to work being done by
OpenID working groups? I'm very supportive of pushing the standards
forward via prototypes, but that should be done as part of the OpenID
community instead of by a single company.
I'd be very happy to help get a discovery
A charter proposal for the WG already exists.
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:49 PM, David Recordonda...@sixapart.com wrote:
Should this experimental namespace only apply to work being done by OpenID
working groups? I'm very supportive of pushing the standards forward via
prototypes, but that
Hi guys,
Google would like to launch a feature in which we're allowing our Google
Apps hosted domains to become OpenID providers. The authentication part of
it is pretty simple - Google is already logging in users to their apps, so
we can also host an OP endpoint for those domains and send
