[speedtouch] pppoa3 and netfilter

2003-01-29 Thread Matthieu Foillard
I noticed that pppoa3 eats cpu time (about 4-5%) when i enable some iptables rules and make my connection laggy (e.g. ping the second host in my route is about 500 ms and is 55 ms when i disable flush all rules). Did you noticed somethings similar ? If yes, any solutions u should provide ?

[speedtouch] Re: pppoa3 and netfilter

2003-01-29 Thread Matthieu Foillard
Le Wednesday 29 January 2003 10:11, Matthieu Foillard a écrit : I noticed that pppoa3 eats cpu time (about 4-5%) when i enable some iptables rules and make my connection laggy (e.g. ping the second host in my route is about 500 ms and is 55 ms when i disable flush all rules). Did you noticed

[speedtouch] Re: pppoa3 and netfilter

2003-01-29 Thread Tim Woodall
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Matthieu Foillard wrote: Le Wednesday 29 January 2003 10:11, Matthieu Foillard a écrit : I noticed that pppoa3 eats cpu time (about 4-5%) when i enable some iptables rules and make my connection laggy (e.g. ping the second host in my route is about 500 ms and is 55

[speedtouch] modem_run ends before synchronosiation? faster?

2003-01-29 Thread poff
Hi, Is it possible either to: -run modem_run as a background background process on startup so it doesn't wait to run beofre continuing (I have it in rc.local on netbsd) -OR modify it so it finishes when the modem microcode is loaded and not when the line is synchornised? Don't know if you've

[speedtouch] Re: modem_run ends before synchronosiation? faster?

2003-01-29 Thread Martin Drautzburg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, Is it possible either to: -run modem_run as a background background process on startup so it doesn't wait to run beofre continuing Yes you can, but you have to make sure that everything runs in the correct order. I have an /etc/init.d/speedtouch startup