[speedtouch] Re: LCP timeout sending Config-Requests

2004-02-08 Thread Paul Smith
>>username/password. To be precise, I get the following message in the >>file /var/log/messages: "LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests". I am >>absolutely sure that the introduced pair username/password is correct. >>Could somebody here please help me? > > > I know you say it's definitely not

[speedtouch] 330/Rev 400 (silver modem) - Got it working!

2004-02-08 Thread Michael Eccleston
Dear All, Thanks to the efforts of Martin Galpin and Lewis Jardine, I have now also got my REV 4.0 silver modem working. Since a lot of people are asking me for the modified modem_run.c file that Martin sent me I have put this and the ZZZLP2.eni on one of my web servers. http://ecclestons.biz

[speedtouch] Re: LCP timeout sending Config-Requests

2004-02-08 Thread Dave Thorn
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 10:30:12PM +, Dave Thorn wrote: > > I know you say it's definitely not this, so I'm probably just irritating > you, but I was getting this and thought I'd set my user/pass correctly; > it turns out I only had it in pap-secrets and neededn't to put it in

[speedtouch] Re: usb-urb - error. I can not connet

2004-02-08 Thread nacho
Dear all, I receive the next messages "usbdevfs:USBDEVFS_BULK failed dev 2 ep 0x7 len 53 net 110" Some suggestion to this error?. Although, "ifconfig ppp0" provide a configuration, it does not connect. I have the two lights of the modem in green, but I am not sure that the system has realised

[speedtouch] Re: LCP timeout sending Config-Requests

2004-02-08 Thread Dave Thorn
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 09:56:54PM +, Paul Smith wrote: > > username/password. To be precise, I get the following message in the > file /var/log/messages: "LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests". I am > absolutely sure that the introduced pair username/password is correct. > Could somebody

[speedtouch] LCP timeout sending Config-Requests

2004-02-08 Thread Paul Smith
Dear All I have tried to connect my ADSL modem (Alcatel Speedtouch USB modem, the green one) under Mandrake 9.2. (I have also tried with RedHat 9.) I suspect that everything is correctly installed but when I try to establish the connection, I get a message that complains about my username/pas

[speedtouch] Re: help needed with testing auto-detect Rev patch

2004-02-08 Thread Gary Bilkus
That might work. What I actually did was put a timeout in the subprocess: (from line 1090 of original file) memset(prevbuf, 0, TOTAL); static int timeoutfirsttime = 25000; while(1) { int ret; unsigned char lbuf[6]; /* We can try reading

[speedtouch] Re: help needed with testing auto-detect Rev patch

2004-02-08 Thread John Hysted
Would it be likely to work if I replaced if (revision==4) timed_out = 0; which is an arbitrary hack which assumes everything worked for Rev 0400 after seconds, with if (revision==4) { if (timed_out) { if(signal_kernel) { pusb_ioctl(fdusb, 1, 1, NULL); }

[speedtouch] Re: 330/Rev 400 success

2004-02-08 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 08 February 2004 04:24 pm, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hello Martin, > > > > > http://www.nemohackers.org/speedtouch.php > > > > > > The patch available there seems to be mangled. > > > > So it does. I apoligise for that, I think gFTP me

[speedtouch] Re: 330/Rev 400 success

2004-02-08 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hello Martin, > > > http://www.nemohackers.org/speedtouch.php > > > > The patch available there seems to be mangled. > So it does. I apoligise for that, I think gFTP messed up alittle. > > It's fixed now. http://www.nemohackers.org/speedtouch/ : modem_run.diff 08-Feb-2004 10:4219

[speedtouch] Re: help needed with testing auto-detect Rev patch

2004-02-08 Thread Gary Bilkus
John, I don't think your patched version will work with a silver rev 4 modem in kernel driver mode. As per the thread involving myself and others last week, the v4 software doesn't report status back after connecting, as a result of which the subprocess after fork() will not signal the main proc

[speedtouch] Re: help needed with testing auto-detect Rev patch

2004-02-08 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 08 February 2004 09:48 am, John Hysted wrote: > I have produced a patch for modem_run which should auto-detect the modem > revision and execute the appropriate code for Rev , 0200 and 0400 > modems, but as I only have a green frog I am u

[speedtouch] Re: 330/Rev 400 success

2004-02-08 Thread Martin Galpin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 08 February 2004 03:37 pm, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hello Martin, > > > I finally got my own patch to work today! So, I'm free once again. > > Great! Thanks for putting in your effort. > > > http://www.nemohackers.org/speedtouch.php >

[speedtouch] Re: 330/Rev 400 success

2004-02-08 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hello Martin, > I finally got my own patch to work today! So, I'm free once again. Great! Thanks for putting in your effort. > http://www.nemohackers.org/speedtouch.php The patch available there seems to be mangled. Bye, Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research Liste de

[speedtouch] help needed with testing auto-detect Rev patch

2004-02-08 Thread John Hysted
I have produced a patch for modem_run which should auto-detect the modem revision and execute the appropriate code for Rev , 0200 and 0400 modems, but as I only have a green frog I am unable to test this. For me, the patch fixes the "Error reading usb urb under heavy load on version 1.2" probl