[speedtouch] Re: pppoa3, was Re: OAM Cells

2001-09-30 Thread Tony Finch
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 12:58:56PM -, Alex Bennee wrote: > > It looked from your dump you where getting some comms? or was it all your > client side without responses? I think there was some communication going on; I can't tell what caused it to give up though. Tony. Liste de diffusion mo

[speedtouch] Re: pppoa3, was Re: OAM Cells

2001-09-30 Thread Alex Bennee
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 12:30:09PM +0200, Edouard Gomez wrote: >> >>pppoa3 doesn't run well on BSD systems for an unknown reason. I'm >> sorry but i haven't enough free space on my hd to install a BSD >> system and see what goes wrong with it. > > Hmm, I see it is threaded. The pthreads

[speedtouch] Re: pppoa3, was Re: OAM Cells

2001-09-30 Thread Tony Finch
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 12:30:09PM +0200, Edouard Gomez wrote: > >pppoa3 doesn't run well on BSD systems for an unknown reason. I'm > sorry but i haven't enough free space on my hd to install a BSD system > and see what goes wrong with it. Hmm, I see it is threaded. The pthreads implement

[speedtouch] Re: pppoa3, was Re: OAM Cells

2001-09-30 Thread Edouard Gomez
Tony Finch wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 10:52:25PM -, Alex Bennee wrote: > >>>How reliable is pppoa3 supposed to be now? I could try that quite >>>easily. >>> >>As a rock :-) Seriously I've run pppoa3 for 7+ days without any problems. >> > > I've taken a spare moment to have a try of pp