pe, 2009-11-13 kello 19:49 +0100, Nils Wagner kirjoitti:
[clip]
That's a possible bug in the numpydoc Sphinx extension, not in Sphinx
itself -- so the proper place to report it is probably in Numpy's trac
(component 'Documentation').
--
Pauli Virtanen
--~--~-~--~~~---
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sphinx-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to sphinx-dev@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sphinx-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 3:12 AM, Michael Jones wrote:
>
> Thank you for this. I confess that part of me has a soft spot for the
> original shell script implementation but if Python is faster and
> indeed more portable then it makes sense to switch. I'll pull and
> update as necessary.
If you lik
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 6:01 AM, Jean Daniel
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Make sure to rename the '_sources' directory in the searchtool.js,
> line 389, or else the search page will not work correctly (I think
> this directory name is hardcoded). In the python script, this is 'if
> file.endswith(".html"
Also, I read searchtool.js, it is a super cool gem. Very smart !
Cheers,
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Jean Daniel
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Make sure to rename the '_sources' directory in the searchtool.js,
> line 389, or else the search page will not work correctly (I think
> this directory
Hello,
Make sure to rename the '_sources' directory in the searchtool.js,
line 389, or else the search page will not work correctly (I think
this directory name is hardcoded). In the python script, this is 'if
file.endswith(".html") or file.endswith(".js")', in bash this is 'find
-type f' without
Georg Brandl wrote:
>> Actually, chatting with Georg on IRC, it turned out to be:
>
> Actually, that was R. David Murray, not me :)
But birkenfeld and bitdancer both start with 'bi'?! ;-)
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting
- http://www.s
Thank you for this. I confess that part of me has a soft spot for the
original shell script implementation but if Python is faster and
indeed more portable then it makes sense to switch. I'll pull and
update as necessary.
Michael
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:24 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
Chris Withers wrote:
> Note the very subtle difference. It's a bug, but the above is a
> workaround for now...
So subtle my mua ended up srewing it up...
> Actually, chatting with Georg^wRDM? on IRC, it turned out to be:
>
> >>> from testfixtures import compare
> >>> compare(1,
> ...
