On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Mike Hansen wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 12:30 PM, chrism wrote:
>> This might be interesting for folks who want to produce printed books
>> with Sphinx.
>
> You can also go the other direction and turn printed books into nice
> HTML versions using Sphinx.
>
>
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 20:31, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 19:30, chrism wrote:
>> This might be interesting for folks who want to produce printed books
>> with Sphinx.
>
> Very much, thanks! That geometry package helped a lot.
And here is another phat tip for others: Use xe
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 19:30, chrism wrote:
> This might be interesting for folks who want to produce printed books
> with Sphinx.
Very much, thanks! That geometry package helped a lot.
--
Lennart Regebro: Python, Zope, Plone, Grok
http://regebro.wordpress.com/
+33 661 58 14 64
--
You receiv
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 12:30 PM, chrism wrote:
> This might be interesting for folks who want to produce printed books
> with Sphinx.
You can also go the other direction and turn printed books into nice
HTML versions using Sphinx.
http://wstein.org/books/modform/modform/index.html
is an HTML v
This might be interesting for folks who want to produce printed books
with Sphinx.
I am about to submit some variant on the following book about
repoze.bfg (http://bfg.repoze.org), produced with Sphinx, for
commercial publication:
http://static.repoze.org/bfg-1.2a9-v3.pdf
You can take a look at
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 16:00, Chris Withers wrote:
>> Scratch that, I got it to work now. Anyway, the code in question
>> *does* raise an exception, but I don't want that exception to be
>> rendered in the output, which still means Manuel doesn't help me solve
>> the problem.
>
> try except?
No,
Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 14:38, Chris Withers wrote:
>>> However, it still completely refuses to execute any codeblock stuff
>>> (or at least reports no error, even though the code is invalid). It's
>>> also not clear to me how the output of a codeblock would be tested.
>
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 14:38, Chris Withers wrote:
>> However, it still completely refuses to execute any codeblock stuff
>> (or at least reports no error, even though the code is invalid). It's
>> also not clear to me how the output of a codeblock would be tested.
Scratch that, I got it to work
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 14:38, Chris Withers wrote:
> What "it" are you referring to?
Well, the tests, using manuel. Although only the >>> tests.
>> However, it still completely refuses to execute any codeblock stuff
>> (or at least reports no error, even though the code is invalid). It's
>> als
Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 11:51, Chris Withers wrote:
>> Lennart Regebro wrote:
>>> So. I want either to get a normal unittest.TextTestRunner().run(suite)
>>> to include the testcode blocks, *or* I need to override the testparser
>>> for sphinx. Any recommendations for how t
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 11:51, Chris Withers wrote:
> Lennart Regebro wrote:
>> So. I want either to get a normal unittest.TextTestRunner().run(suite)
>> to include the testcode blocks, *or* I need to override the testparser
>> for sphinx. Any recommendations for how to do this? Looking into how
>
Lennart Regebro wrote:
> So. I want either to get a normal unittest.TextTestRunner().run(suite)
> to include the testcode blocks, *or* I need to override the testparser
> for sphinx. Any recommendations for how to do this? Looking into how
> sphinx.ext.doctest works, I believe the first option is
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
