On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 3:16 AM, qx guy wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 11, 8:34 am, TP wrote:
>> rst_prolog="""
>>
>> .. |versionG| replace:: :guilabel:`%s`
>>
>> """ % (version,)
>> So now I can do:
>>
>> Right-click :guilabel:`blah-`\ |versionG| to do foo.
>
> Thanks for this tip. But I'm not qui
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 17.11.2010 21:14, schrieb Georg Brandl:
> Am 17.11.2010 21:03, schrieb Michael Jones:
>> It was much easier to get Mercurial working at my company than I would
>> have thought!
>
>> So I made:
>
>> https://bitbucket.org/michaeljones/sphinx
>
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 17.11.2010 21:03, schrieb Michael Jones:
> It was much easier to get Mercurial working at my company than I would
> have thought!
>
> So I made:
>
> https://bitbucket.org/michaeljones/sphinx
>
> With a couple of fixes. I sent a pull request but
It was much easier to get Mercurial working at my company than I would
have thought!
So I made:
https://bitbucket.org/michaeljones/sphinx
With a couple of fixes. I sent a pull request but I'm not sure it
worked as it said "Sending to 0 people"
Cheers,
Michael
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 7:59 AM
Hi,
I think that if I use the cpp domain function (or member) directive to
match a class destructor like:
.. cpp:function:: mynamespace::MyClass::~MyClass()
or
.. cpp:member:: mynamespace::MyClass::~MyClass()
I get an error like:
/path/to/simpletest/source/index.rst:26: WARNING: Inva
> As far as links go, you might try this technique in combination with
> the sphinx.ext.extlinks – Markup to shorten external links extension.
> Seehttp://sphinx.pocoo.org/ext/extlinks.htmlfor details. (Pretty
> sure this works for any links not just "external" ones).
Just to let you know: The hin
On Nov 11, 8:34 am, TP wrote:
> rst_prolog="""
>
> .. |versionG| replace:: :guilabel:`%s`
>
> """ % (version,)
> So now I can do:
>
> Right-click :guilabel:`blah-`\ |versionG| to do foo.
Thanks for this tip. But I'm not quite getting this particular
example. Wouldn't your text expand t
On Nov 11, 10:56 am, Guenter Milde wrote:
> Putting the effort into solving the core problem would IMO be the best
> long term solution.
You mean, becoming a commiter on the docutils project? :).
T.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sphinx-dev" gr