[sphinx-dev] Undefined references for glossary entries with multiple voices

2012-04-22 Thread Roberto Bagnara
' on page 47 undefined on input line 2906. Would it be possible to provide anchors for all the voices? Thanks, Roberto -- Prof. Roberto Bagnara Applied Formal Methods Laboratory Department of Mathematics, University of Parma, Italy http://www.cs.unipr.it/~bagnara/ mailto:bagn...@cs.uni

Re: [sphinx-dev] Release of 1.1: any plans?

2011-06-22 Thread Roberto Bagnara
On 06/22/11 21:57, Georg Brandl wrote: On 22.06.2011 21:50, Roberto Bagnara wrote: On 02/28/11 20:09, Georg Brandl wrote: On 28.02.2011 19:41, Prof. Roberto Bagnara wrote: Has this been planned? I am looking forward to the possibility of having multiple terms per entry in a glossary

Re: [sphinx-dev] Release of 1.1: any plans?

2011-06-22 Thread Roberto Bagnara
On 02/28/11 20:09, Georg Brandl wrote: On 28.02.2011 19:41, Prof. Roberto Bagnara wrote: Has this been planned? I am looking forward to the possibility of having multiple terms per entry in a glossary. Unfortunately, I currently was and still am quite busy (as you also can see from my lack

[sphinx-dev] Release of 1.1: any plans?

2011-02-28 Thread Prof. Roberto Bagnara
Has this been planned? I am looking forward to the possibility of having multiple terms per entry in a glossary. Thanks, Roberto -- Prof. Roberto Bagnara Applied Formal Methods Laboratory Department of Mathematics, University of Parma, Italy http://www.cs.unipr.it/~bagnara/ mailto:bagn

[sphinx-dev] Limitations of glossary (unless I am missing something)

2010-12-09 Thread Roberto Bagnara
re is a better way. Moreover, I have found no workaroung for 2). Thanks, Roberto -- Prof. Roberto Bagnara Applied Formal Methods Laboratory Department of Mathematics, University of Parma, Italy http://www.cs.unipr.it/~bagnara/ mailto:bagn...@cs.unipr.it -- You received this message because yo