Cool! I'll take a look at those test cases and try writing it into a PR!
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 11:00 AM Komiya Takeshi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Good challenge. It seems your patch is good enough.
>
> >I suspect the additional package is safer but I started out by trying to
> understand where the module
Hi,
Good challenge. It seems your patch is good enough.
>I suspect the additional package is safer but I started out by trying to
>understand where the module name is getting created in autodoc, and haven't
>figured out how to access the module name from nodes yet. Pointers welcome.
The `desc_
