Thanks Takeshi -- that is a nice idea. I will give that a shot.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:22 PM Komiya Takeshi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How about using a transform having a very high priority? Then you can
> access a doctree (a.k.a. AST) just after the parsed.
>
> Thanks,
> Takeshi KOMIYA
>
>
Hi,
How about using a transform having a very high priority? Then you can
access a doctree (a.k.a. AST) just after the parsed.
Thanks,
Takeshi KOMIYA
2020年8月10日(月) 10:49 Matt McKay :
>
> Hi Sphinx Group.
>
> Is there a way to access the Sphinx abstract syntax tree (AST) before any
> transforms
Hi,
The collector.get_updated_docs() is called to detect output files that
is needed to be re-generated. It is called just after the reading
phase. It means the event is designed as read-only. For example, it is
useful to detect files that is effected to the change of ToC numbers
when a new
Hi Sphinx Group.
Is there a way to access the Sphinx abstract syntax tree (AST) *before* any
transforms or post-transforms are applied (i.e. directly after the parser
phase)?
I am writing an extension to convert reST to Myst syntax but I am finding
restoring some of the information contained
I totally agree with you!
On Sunday, August 9, 2020 at 12:02:30 AM UTC+2 Ken wrote:
> Hi Yves,
>
> Stack Overflow is great for things in Question/Answer format. If the goal
> is to also have general discussion on Sphinx topics, not necessarily around
> questions, then Discourse
I noticed a lot of complexity in Sphinx due to the fact the nodes cannot be
altered during the EnvironmentCollector phase. However I don't understand
why it works that way.
For example, here below I would like to *tag* each `nodes.title` with an
attribute, but as this is not the same
Thanks for this! I have a better understanding now.
On Sunday, August 9, 2020 at 10:33:16 AM UTC+2 matthia...@gmail.com wrote:
> For reference, this has recently been discussed on the issue tracker:
> https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/issues/7838.
>
> It looks like docutils made the decision
For reference, this has recently been discussed on the issue tracker:
https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/issues/7838.
It looks like docutils made the decision for the HTML5 writer to
always keep elements and handle "compact" lists with CSS (instead
of removing elements).
At the time, this