Oh, I'd forgotten it. But, yes, I meant it.
2020年2月25日(火) 1:00 'Mmanu Chaturvedi' via sphinx-users
:
>
> Hi Takeshi Komiya,
>
> Thanks! This must be the issue, right?
> https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/issues/5270
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro
Hi Takeshi Komiya,
Thanks! This must be the issue, right?
https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/issues/5270
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sphinx-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sphi
Hi,
If you'd like to sort members by definition order, it would be better
to follow PEP-520. Since py36, using cls.__dict__ is much appropriate
way to sort members "by source" instead of analyzer.
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0520/
Thanks,
Takeshi KOMIYA
2020年2月18日(火) 3:15 'Mmanu Chaturve
oaeora...@gmail.com
ในวันที่ อ. 18 ก.พ. 2020 05:22 'Mmanu Chaturvedi' via sphinx-users <
sphinx-users@googlegroups.com> เขียนว่า:
> I tried to create a PR, which adds the ability to add a custom key
> function:
>
> https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/pull/7177
>
> If you think it's acceptable, I
I tried to create a PR, which adds the ability to add a custom key function:
https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/pull/7177
If you think it's acceptable, I can create a corresponding issue as well.
When the python code is in `.so` format which we import, the analyzer
doesn't work on it.
On Mon
Hi Takeshi Komiya,
Thanks for the reply!
> Is this resolved if we'll add an option for sorting methods by
> definition order (in source code)?
Yes, that could possibly resolve the issue. We seem to have the `bysource`
option, which seems to be for sorting by source, but it doesn't work for
Hi,
Is this resolved if we'll add an option for sorting methods by
definition order (in source code)?
We have an issue to add such option. I'd like to know it helps your case or not.
Thanks,
Takeshi KOMIYA
2020年2月6日(木) 13:58 'Mmanu Chaturvedi' via sphinx-users
:
>
> Hi,
>
> Consider the followin
oaeora...@gmail.com
ในวันที่ พฤ. 6 ก.พ. 2020 11:58 'Mmanu Chaturvedi' via sphinx-users <
sphinx-users@googlegroups.com> เขียนว่า:
> Hi,
>
> Consider the following problem:
>
> Suppose we have three methods bound to a class `C` with the following
> names:
> `__init__`, `a` and `A`.
>
> Now, in the
Hi,
Consider the following problem:
Suppose we have three methods bound to a class `C` with the following names:
`__init__`, `a` and `A`.
Now, in the documentation created by sphinx, we'd have documentation in
order (when `member-order` is `alphabetic`) :
`A`, `__init__` and `a`.
it seems like
