[spi-devel-general] Accelerometer, Gyros and ADC's etc within the kernel.

2008-05-20 Thread Jonathan Cameron
This email is basically a request for opinions on how and where such sensors should be integrated into the kernel. To set the scene... Increasing numbers of embedded devices are being supplied attached MEMS devices (www.xbow.com imote2 etc). Along with more traditional sensors such as ADC's not

Re: [spi-devel-general] Accelerometer, Gyros and ADC's etc within the kernel.

2008-05-20 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Jonathan, On Tue, 20 May 2008 11:04:01 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: This email is basically a request for opinions on how and where such sensors should be integrated into the kernel. To set the scene... Increasing numbers of embedded devices are being supplied attached MEMS devices

Re: [spi-devel-general] [PATCH 3/4] spi: Add OF binding support for SPI busses

2008-05-20 Thread Grant Likely
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 19 May 2008, Grant Likely wrote: I'm not so fond of this approach. cs-parent doesn't seem to make much sense to me. It might be better to have a cs-handler property on the SPI bus node instead of on the

Re: [spi-devel-general] Accelerometer, Gyros and ADC's etc within the kernel.

2008-05-20 Thread mark gross
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:04:01AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: This email is basically a request for opinions on how and where such sensors should be integrated into the kernel. To set the scene... Increasing numbers of embedded devices are being supplied attached MEMS devices