Hi David, Stefan,
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 11:32:25 -0800 David Brownell wrote:
>
> Also:
>
> > +static struct of_platform_driver spi_ppc4xx_of_driver = {
> > + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > + .name = DRIVER_NAME,
>
> I'd hope the PPC folk eliminate this duplication soonish.
> Those fields a
Also:
> +static struct of_platform_driver spi_ppc4xx_of_driver = {
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .name = DRIVER_NAME,
I'd hope the PPC folk eliminate this duplication soonish.
Those fields are obvious duplicates of the driver model
fields...
> + .match_table = spi_ppc4xx_of_ma
On Tuesday 25 November 2008, Stefan Roese wrote:
> Changes in v5:
> - Don't call setupxfer() from setup() so that the baudrate etc
> won't get changed while another transfer is active, as suggested
> by David Brownell.
Better, but this still doesn't seem quite right:
> +static int spi_ppc4xx
Brian just mailed an electronic Christmas greeting card.
You can click the following link to see your ecard:
http://freedecember.com/?ID=8e815b7a9ceac1
Regards, Webmaster
--
__
