Pour voir le message, veuillez utiliser un lecteur de mail compatible HTML
Lien miroir :
http://m10-fr.com/mc10_m/YT04JmI9NzU5OCZjPTE5NjE2NDEmZD0yMDEyLTAzLTExIDE4OjQwOjAxJmU9MSZoPTc1OTcmZj03NTk4Jmc9NzU5OA==
Lien de désinscription :
http://m10-fr.com/mc10_unsub/YT04JmI9NzU5OCZjPTE5NjE2NDEmZD0yMD
On 08:07 Sun 11 Mar , Grant Likely wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 19:25:44 +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
> wrote:
> > This will allow to use gpio for chip select with no modification in the
> > driver binding
> >
> > When use the cs-gpios, the gpio number will be passed via the cs_gp
On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 19:25:44 +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
wrote:
> This will allow to use gpio for chip select with no modification in the
> driver binding
>
> When use the cs-gpios, the gpio number will be passed via the cs_gpio field
> and the number of chip select will automaticall
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 09:20:59 +0300, Dan Carpenter
wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 07:43:07PM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 10:38:27 +0100, walter harms wrote:
> > > hi Dan,
> > > do you want to protect dev_err() by a spn_lock ?
> >
> > Applied, after moving unlock above th
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 12:30:00PM +1100, Marc Reilly wrote:
> This patch abstracts the bus specific operations from the driver core.
> Read and write handlers are introduced and generic initialization is
> consolidated into mc13xxx_comon_init. The irq member is removed because
s/_comon_/_common_/