Hi
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 19:08:49 +0100
Matthias Brugger wrote:
> @@ -1020,7 +1038,7 @@ static void omap2_mcspi_work(struct omap2_mcspi *mcspi,
> struct spi_message *m)
> }
>
> static int omap2_mcspi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_master *master,
> -
Matt,
On 1/24/2013 3:07 AM, Matt Porter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:21:42AM +0800, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:26:34PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>>> On 1/16/2013 2:02 AM, Matt Porter wrote:
>>
This series adds DMA Engine support for AM33xx, which uses
an EDMA
On Thursday 24 January 2013 02:19 AM, Matt Porter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 04:37:55PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> Matt,
>>
>> On Wednesday 16 January 2013 02:02 AM, Matt Porter wrote:
>>
>> [..]
>>
>>> This series adds DMA Engine support for AM33xx, which uses
>>> an EDMA DMAC. The E
Pour voir le message, veuillez utiliser un lecteur de mail compatible HTML
Lien miroir :
http://m10-fr.com/mc10_m/YT0xMyZiPTMwNDk1JmM9NDgzNjEyJmQ9MjAxMy0wMS0yNCAwNToxMDowMSZlPTEmaD0zMDQ5MyZmPTMwNDk1Jmc9MzA0OTU=
Lien de desinscription :
http://m10-fr.com/mc10_unsub/YT0xMyZiPTMwNDk1JmM9NDgzNjEyJm
Thanks a lot for so much comments
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Genoud [mailto:richard.gen...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 2013年1月24日 0:25
> To: Yang, Wenyou
> Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Ferre,
> Nicolas; plagn...@jcrosoft.com; Lin, JM; grant.lik..
On Tuesday 15 January 2013, Matt Porter wrote:
> Adds a dma_request_slave_channel_compat() wrapper which accepts
> both the arguments from dma_request_channel() and
> dma_request_slave_channel(). Based on whether the driver is
> instantiated via DT, the appropriate channel request call will be
> ma
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:21:42AM +0800, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:26:34PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> > On 1/16/2013 2:02 AM, Matt Porter wrote:
>
> > > This series adds DMA Engine support for AM33xx, which uses
> > > an EDMA DMAC. The EDMA DMAC has been previously supported
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 03:40:06PM +, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> Matt,
>
> Sorry about the late reply. I noticed this mail only after I started to
> look at v5 of your series :(
Any time is fine! :)
> On 1/11/2013 5:21 AM, Matt Porter wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 01:47:09PM +0530, Sekhar No
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 04:37:55PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> Matt,
>
> On Wednesday 16 January 2013 02:02 AM, Matt Porter wrote:
>
> [..]
>
> >This series adds DMA Engine support for AM33xx, which uses
> >an EDMA DMAC. The EDMA DMAC has been previously supported by only
> >a private API
This patch allows the board code to define SPI devices which needs to
toggle the chip select after every word send. This is needed to get a
better resolution reading e.g. an ADC data stream.
Apart from that, as in the normal code CS is controlled by software,
a transfer is done much faster.
Signed
2013/1/14 Wenyou Yang :
> From: Nicolas Ferre
>
> Add dmaengine support.
>
> For different SoC, the "has_dma_support" is used to select
> the transfer mode: dmaengine or PDC.
>
> For the dmaengine transfer mode, if it fails to config dmaengine,
> or if the message len less than 16 bytes, it will u
Matt,
On Wednesday 16 January 2013 02:02 AM, Matt Porter wrote:
[..]
This series adds DMA Engine support for AM33xx, which uses
an EDMA DMAC. The EDMA DMAC has been previously supported by only
a private API implementation (much like the situation with OMAP
DMA) found on the DaVinci family of
Hi Mark,
On 1/23/2013 7:51 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:26:34PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> On 1/16/2013 2:02 AM, Matt Porter wrote:
>
>>> This series adds DMA Engine support for AM33xx, which uses
>>> an EDMA DMAC. The EDMA DMAC has been previously supported by only
>>> a
13 matches
Mail list logo
