Re: [PATCH v7 01/10] ARM: davinci: move private EDMA API to arm/common

2013-02-02 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Matt Porter [130202 11:51]: > On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 10:16:43AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Matt Porter [130202 10:10]: > > > If it doesn't work, work with Vinod to fix the api. It's expected, > > > I'm working on dmaengine API changes right now to deal with a > > > limitation of EDMA th

Re: Build regressions/improvements in v3.8-rc6

2013-02-02 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Sat, 2 Feb 2013, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > JFYI, when comparing v3.8-rc6 to v3.8-rc5[3], the summaries are: > - build errors: +6/-6 Ignoring the ppc truncated relocations, there's only one regression: + error: spi-rspi.c: undefined reference to `shdma_chan_filter': => .text+0xf1074) s

Re: [PATCH v7 01/10] ARM: davinci: move private EDMA API to arm/common

2013-02-02 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello. On 02-02-2013 23:55, Matt Porter wrote: > Move mach-davinci/dma.c to common/edma.c so it can be used > by OMAP (specifically AM33xx) as well. I think this should rather go to drivers/dma/? >>> No, this is the private EDMA API. It's the analogous thing to

Re: [PATCH v7 01/10] ARM: davinci: move private EDMA API to arm/common

2013-02-02 Thread Matt Porter
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 07:06:06PM +, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > On 02-02-2013 22:07, Matt Porter wrote: > > >>> Move mach-davinci/dma.c to common/edma.c so it can be used > >>> by OMAP (specifically AM33xx) as well. > > >> I think this should rather go to drivers/dma/?

Re: [PATCH v7 01/10] ARM: davinci: move private EDMA API to arm/common

2013-02-02 Thread Matt Porter
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 10:16:43AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Matt Porter [130202 10:10]: > > If it doesn't work, work with Vinod to fix the api. It's expected, > > I'm working on dmaengine API changes right now to deal with a > > limitation of EDMA that needs to be abstracted. > > Regarding

Re: [PATCH v7 01/10] ARM: davinci: move private EDMA API to arm/common

2013-02-02 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello. On 02-02-2013 22:07, Matt Porter wrote: >>> Move mach-davinci/dma.c to common/edma.c so it can be used >>> by OMAP (specifically AM33xx) as well. >> I think this should rather go to drivers/dma/? > No, this is the private EDMA API. It's the analogous thing to > the pr

Re: [PATCH v7 01/10] ARM: davinci: move private EDMA API to arm/common

2013-02-02 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Matt Porter [130202 10:10]: > If it doesn't work, work with Vinod to fix the api. It's expected, > I'm working on dmaengine API changes right now to deal with a > limitation of EDMA that needs to be abstracted. Regarding the DMA API limitations, I'm only aware of lack of capability to configure

Re: [PATCH v7 01/10] ARM: davinci: move private EDMA API to arm/common

2013-02-02 Thread Matt Porter
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 12:01:37AM +, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > On 01-02-2013 22:59, Matt Porter wrote: > > > Move mach-davinci/dma.c to common/edma.c so it can be used > > by OMAP (specifically AM33xx) as well. > > I think this should rather go to drivers/dma/? > > >

Re: [PATCH v7 01/10] ARM: davinci: move private EDMA API to arm/common

2013-02-02 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello. On 02-02-2013 16:45, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > Now, CPPI is brand new code to arch/arm - always has been. It post-dates > the DMA engine API. And it's been said many times about moving it to > drivers/dma. The problem is Sergei doesn't want to do it - he's anti the I *can't

Re: [PATCH v7 01/10] ARM: davinci: move private EDMA API to arm/common

2013-02-02 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello. On 02-02-2013 20:45, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >>> There are two people on this thread CC list who were also involved or >>> CC'd on the mails from the thread in 2010... Tony and Felipe. >>> Unfortunately, the person who agreed to do the work is no longer in the >>> land of the livi

Re: [PATCH v7 01/10] ARM: davinci: move private EDMA API to arm/common

2013-02-02 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello. On 02-02-2013 16:17, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > good point, do you wanna send some patches ? I have already sent them countless times and even stuck CPPI 4.1 support (in arch/arm/common/cppi41.c) in Russell's patch system. TI requested to

Re: [PATCH v7 01/10] ARM: davinci: move private EDMA API to arm/common

2013-02-02 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 08:27:42PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: >> There are two people on this thread CC list who were also involved or >> CC'd on the mails from the thread in 2010... Tony and Felipe. >> Unfortunately, the person who agreed to do the work is no longer in the >> land of the livin

Re: [PATCH v7 01/10] ARM: davinci: move private EDMA API to arm/common

2013-02-02 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello. On 02-02-2013 14:18, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 11:49:11PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: good point, do you wanna send some patches ? >>> I have already sent them countless times and even stuck CPPI 4.1 >>> support (in >>> ar

Re: [PATCH v7 01/10] ARM: davinci: move private EDMA API to arm/common

2013-02-02 Thread Matt Porter
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 12:49:06PM +, Russell King wrote: > On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 10:41:08AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Matt Porter [130201 10:25]: > > > Move mach-davinci/dma.c to common/edma.c so it can be used > > > by OMAP (specifically AM33xx) as well. > > > > I think this shoul

Re: [PATCH v7 01/10] ARM: davinci: move private EDMA API to arm/common

2013-02-02 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 10:41:08AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Matt Porter [130201 10:25]: > > Move mach-davinci/dma.c to common/edma.c so it can be used > > by OMAP (specifically AM33xx) as well. > > I think this should rather go to drivers/dma/? Yes, it should, but just like OMAP, there's

Re: [PATCH v7 01/10] ARM: davinci: move private EDMA API to arm/common

2013-02-02 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 01:59:59PM -0500, Matt Porter wrote: > On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 07:52:46PM +, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > > Hello. > > > > On 02/01/2013 09:49 PM, Matt Porter wrote: > > > > >>> Move mach-davinci/dma.c to common/edma.c so it can be used > > >>> by OMAP (specifically AM33xx

Re: [PATCH v7 01/10] ARM: davinci: move private EDMA API to arm/common

2013-02-02 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 10:18:51AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 06:09:24AM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > > Hello. > > > > On 02-02-2013 4:44, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 11:49:11PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > >>>

Re: [PATCH v7 01/10] ARM: davinci: move private EDMA API to arm/common

2013-02-02 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 06:09:24AM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > On 02-02-2013 4:44, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 11:49:11PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: >>> good point, do you wanna send some patches ? > >> I have already sent them coun