(http://ocfm40.com/t2uzrerfoud0plmocd/index0.html)
(http://ocfm40.com/2xumdedpoy023dpoxs/index1.html)
Nous sommes allés dénicher les dernières astuces pour économiser
(http://ocfm40.com/btuw4e4koxe0f2rf1l/index2.html)
À LA UNE
Comment économiser 90% sur un iPad 4 ou sur un iPhone 5 ?
Vous l'aurez
On 07/09/2013 09:47 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c
>> index e1d7696..f321bf9 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c +++
>> b/drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c @@ -232,21 +232,6 @@ static int
>> xilinx_spi_setup_transfer(struct spi_device *spi, ret
Si le message ne s'affiche pas correctement merci de suivre ce lien:
http://news.teradoo.com/re?l=BqgpnjjI7gfk57dIhix8wzmxI&u=http%3A%2F%2Fnews.teradoo.com%2Fpublic%2Fread_message.jsp%3Ftsp%3D1373383231607%26custid%3D16444%26uid%3D16231069273%26sig%3DPOEKNBGPEABJPLIA%26mid%3D1600191343&s=LOCHCDLK
On 15:40-20130709, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 07:50:55AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>
> > with this input and looking closer, I think I see what you are saying now:
> > dra7xxx_qspi_prepare_xfer -> does a pm_runtime_get_sync
> > dra7xxx_qs
On 07/09/2013 01:51 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 03:33:30PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>> +static int dra7xxx_qspi_start_transfer_one(struct spi_master *master,
>>> + struct spi_message *m)
>>> +{
>>> + struct dra7xxx_qspi *qspi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
On 07/09/2013 05:05 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 09:51:43AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
>>> Looks like a case to use regmap?
>>> Dumb q: why cant we use regmap_spi? worst case, you should be able to
>
>> read regmap-spi and you'll see why it can't be used in this case.
>
>> regm
On Monday 08 July 2013 08:02 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 07:12:59PM +0530, Sourav Poddar wrote:
>> +static inline unsigned long dra7xxx_readl(struct dra7xxx_qspi *qspi,
>> +unsigned long reg)
>> +{
>> +return readl(qspi->base + reg);
>> +}
>> +
>> +stat
On Tuesday 09 July 2013 02:03 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 19:12-20130708, Sourav Poddar wrote:
> [..]
> generic comment, given our historical mistakes of making drivers
> specific to a SoC family, it never is.
>
> Now, ti-qspi in file name is a step in the right direction, but, rest
> of the cod
