r style 'spring cleanup'.
I'm personally somewhere take as it or do nothing. If style is not terribly
wrong I personally favor smaller style fixes when those lines are changing
anyway.
In case maintainer takes this you could add:
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Nikula
--
Jarkko
---
Hi
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 19:08:49 +0100
Matthias Brugger wrote:
> @@ -1020,7 +1038,7 @@ static void omap2_mcspi_work(struct omap2_mcspi *mcspi,
> struct spi_message *m)
> }
>
> static int omap2_mcspi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_master *master,
> -
ects, before calling any of the
> probe functions of SPI devices? (Initializing the controller driver at
> subsys_initcall is one way to accomplish this.)
>
As the N900 framebuffer still appears to be broken would it make sense to queue
above change as a workaround for 3.5 and 3.6?
Aaro: For
"c >= 'pointer increment size'". This ensures that the last word is
transmitted in above case and still allow to break the loop and prevent
variable c underflow in cases where word size != 'pointer increment size'.
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Nikula
Cc: Michael Jones
---
I