The current davinci SPI driver, in DMA mode, is limited to 65535
words for a single transfer. Modify the driver by configuring a
3 dimensional EDMA transfer to support up to 65535x65535
words.
Signed-off-by: Michael Williamson
Tested-by: Stefano Babic
---
changes since v0:
- Added spaces
On 3/14/2011 6:25 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 13-03-2011 17:34, Michael Williamson wrote:
>
>> The current davinci SPI driver, in DMA mode, is limited to 65535
>> words for a single transfer. Modify the driver by configuring a
>> 3 dimensional
The davinci spi driver provides an option to use DMA transfers for
data. In the dma_map_single() call, the driver is passing the
number of words to be transfered for the mapping size. It should
be the number of bytes.
Signed-off-by: Michael Williamson
---
Note: I only have 8 bit devices to
The current davinci SPI driver, in DMA mode, is limited to 65535
words for a single transfer. Modify the driver by configuring a
3 dimensional EDMA transfer to support up to 65535x65535
words.
Signed-off-by: Michael Williamson
---
This patch is an attempt to address the issue raised here:
http
for spi0 out of resources
array and into platform data.
Signed-off-by: Michael Williamson
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori
---
Changes since v1:
- Add Sekhar's Ack.
- Really fix the typo. This time for sure (blew the format patch
on last go around).
arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm
for spi0 out of resources
array and into platform data.
Signed-off-by: Michael Williamson
---
Changes since v0:
- combined separate platform patches with driver patch to avoid
potential regression if doing a bissect.
- fixed up typo per comments.
arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm355.c
Hi Sergei,
On 2/4/2011 7:03 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 04-02-2011 3:34, Michael Williamson wrote:
>
>> For DMA operation, the davinci spi driver needs an eventq number.
>> Currently, this number is passed as a IORESOURCE_DMA. This is not
>> corre
For DMA operation, the davinci spi driver needs an eventq number.
Currently, this number is passed as a IORESOURCE_DMA. This is not
correct, as the eventq is not a DMA channel. Pass the eventq
via the platform data structure instead.
Signed-off-by: Michael Williamson
---
arch/arm/mach-davinci
Move the spi0 eventq assignment out of resources array and into platform data.
Signed-off-by: Michael Williamson
---
arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c |5 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c
index
Move the eventq assignment for spi0 out of resources and into platform data.
Signed-off-by: Michael Williamson
---
arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm355.c |5 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm355.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm355.c
index
forms have not been tested.
Michael Williamson (3):
davinci: spi: move event_q parameter to platform data
davinci: dm355: move spi0 eventq assignment from resources to
platform data
davinci: dm365: move spi0 eventq assignment from resources to
platform data
arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm
On 11/18/2010 08:14 AM, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 17:01:24, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:23:24, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
>>>
>>> Here is the pull request:
>>>
>>> The following changes since commit 0a5b871ea4c6bfb2723ac2ffc7ef5c32452abb89:
>>> Li
On 10/11/2010 12:57 PM, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 18:25:54, Michael Williamson wrote:
>> On 10/08/2010 03:22 PM, Michael Williamson wrote:
>
>>> On 10/6/2010 11:37 AM, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 20,
On 10/11/2010 12:57 PM, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 18:25:54, Michael Williamson wrote:
>> On 10/08/2010 03:22 PM, Michael Williamson wrote:
>
>>> On 10/6/2010 11:37 AM, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 20,
On 10/08/2010 03:22 PM, Michael Williamson wrote:
> Hi Sekhar,
>
> On 10/6/2010 11:37 AM, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 23:12:53, Michael Williamson wrote:
>>>
>>> Let me know if you want testing on the DMA porti
Hi Sekhar,
On 10/6/2010 11:37 AM, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 23:12:53, Michael Williamson wrote:
>>
>> Let me know if you want testing on the DMA portion of the patch (when your
>> ready, of course).
>
> I just finished pushi
Hi Sekhar,
On 10/06/2010 11:37 AM, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 23:12:53, Michael Williamson wrote:
>>
>> Let me know if you want testing on the DMA portion of the patch (when your
>> ready, of course).
>
> I just finished pushi
On 9/20/2010 11:08 AM, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 18:38:13, Michael Williamson wrote:
>>
>> * I'm not sure I understand why there is a "intr_line" field in the platform
>> data and then a possibility to configure
[...]
> I had looking at the original spi code. Nice work, Nori, for break the patch
s/Nori/Sekhar
Sorry about that, Sekhar.
-Mike
--
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to
On 09/14/2010 09:26 AM, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 18:40:56, Michael Williamson wrote:
>> On 9/14/2010 3:14 AM, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:34:59, Caglar Akyuz wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes, your pa
On 9/14/2010 3:14 AM, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:34:59, Caglar Akyuz wrote:
>
>> Yes, your patches seems ok and mostly complete. I'm waiting for hardware to
>> test those, will let you know when I do some testing.
>
> Thanks! To save time, I haven't tested these patches mys
Hi Sekhar,
On 08/23/2010 05:30 AM, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 14:24:10, Caglar Akyuz wrote:
>> On Monday 23 August 2010 07:28:48 am Nori, Sekhar wrote:
>>> Hi Caglar,
>>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> I have been spending time on this (admittedly on and off) since I wrote
>>> th
22 matches
Mail list logo
