On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 01:31:22PM +0200, Dirk Behme wrote:
> Let me know if you can find above thread on one of the both mailing
> lists. If not, I would be happy to resend it again.
Yes, of course - it's hard to apply patches from web archives.
-
On 24.09.2012 12:02, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 08:34:27AM +0200, Dirk Behme wrote:
>
>> Being not so familiar with the flow of SPI patches, I was told that you
>> are taking care of spi patches recently?
>
>> Do you like to have a look to this patch?
>
> Well, nobody appears
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 08:34:27AM +0200, Dirk Behme wrote:
> Being not so familiar with the flow of SPI patches, I was told that you
> are taking care of spi patches recently?
> Do you like to have a look to this patch?
Well, nobody appears to have sent me a copy of it...
---
Hi Mark,
On 24.09.2012 07:06, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:55:11AM +0200, Dirk Behme wrote:
>> From: Knut Wohlrab
>>
>> There are SPI devices which need a SPI clock with active low polarity and
>> high inactive state.
>>
>> Add the setting of the inactive state ECSPIx_CONFIGREG:S
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:55:11AM +0200, Dirk Behme wrote:
> From: Knut Wohlrab
>
> There are SPI devices which need a SPI clock with active low polarity and
> high inactive state.
>
> Add the setting of the inactive state ECSPIx_CONFIGREG:SCLK CTL
> according to the clock polarity ECSPIx_CONFI
Hi Dirk,
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Dirk Behme wrote:
> I'm not so familiar with the SPI world: Who would be the best person to ack
> this, and in case it's ok finally apply it, then?
Mark Brown has been taking care of spi patches recently.
Regards,
Fabio Estevam
--
On 21.09.2012 09:54, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 09:36:51AM +0200, Dirk Behme wrote:
>> On 31.08.2012 04:35, Shawn Guo wrote:
>>> Copy Uwe ...
> Copy our kernel mailing list ...
>
>> Ping ;)
>>
>> Any opinions on this?
> Assuming it fixes access to a device I'm ok with your pa
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 09:36:51AM +0200, Dirk Behme wrote:
> On 31.08.2012 04:35, Shawn Guo wrote:
> >Copy Uwe ...
Copy our kernel mailing list ...
> Ping ;)
>
> Any opinions on this?
Assuming it fixes access to a device I'm ok with your patch, but I don't
really feel responsible for the driver
On 31.08.2012 04:35, Shawn Guo wrote:
> Copy Uwe ...
Ping ;)
Any opinions on this?
Thanks
Dirk
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:55:11AM +0200, Dirk Behme wrote:
>> From: Knut Wohlrab
>>
>> There are SPI devices which need a SPI clock with active low polarity and
>> high inactive state.
>>
>> Add
Copy Uwe ...
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:55:11AM +0200, Dirk Behme wrote:
> From: Knut Wohlrab
>
> There are SPI devices which need a SPI clock with active low polarity and
> high inactive state.
>
> Add the setting of the inactive state ECSPIx_CONFIGREG:SCLK CTL
> according to the clock polarit
From: Knut Wohlrab
There are SPI devices which need a SPI clock with active low polarity and
high inactive state.
Add the setting of the inactive state ECSPIx_CONFIGREG:SCLK CTL
according to the clock polarity ECSPIx_CONFIGREG:SCLK POL:
DT without "spi-cpol" = 0 = clock active high polarity = i
11 matches
Mail list logo