Re: [PATCH 0/2 V2] Adding support for adis16250/5 to adis16260 driver.

2010-10-08 Thread Jonathan Cameron
*bump* For anyone from spi side of things. Quick summary of question (hence top post :) Is it ever wrong to over specify elements of a transfer? We have a driver that (for historical reasons) specifies that a particular transfer is 8 bit. .bits_per_word = 8, This causes issues with the

Re: [PATCH 0/2 V2] Adding support for adis16250/5 to adis16260 driver.

2010-10-08 Thread Grant Likely
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 12:22:28PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: *bump* For anyone from spi side of things. Quick summary of question (hence top post :) Is it ever wrong to over specify elements of a transfer? We have a driver that (for historical reasons) specifies that a particular

Re: [PATCH 0/2 V2] Adding support for adis16250/5 to adis16260 driver.

2010-09-29 Thread Jonathan Cameron
Hi Matthias Lots of additional cc's as I think I know what the problem is and I think it's an spi issue rather than an IIO one. after a long stuggle, I got a working kernel version for my board running as I need it. I tried both the staging/adis16255 and the staging/iio/gyro driver. The