On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> But I'll take it out when I add you Reviewed-by...
>
> Does that imply you will send out a V3 of this series somewhen and I
> don't need to add this right now to the for-grant branch I am currently
> preparing?
No I just added them to my bra
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 11/22/2011 1:55 PM, Linus WALLEIJ wrote:
>> if (list_empty(&pl022->queue) || !pl022->running) {
>> + if (pl022->busy) {
>> + pm_runtime_put(&pl022->adev->dev);
>> + }
>
> We used to get warn
On 11/22/2011 1:55 PM, Linus WALLEIJ wrote:
> if (list_empty(&pl022->queue) || !pl022->running) {
> + if (pl022->busy) {
> + pm_runtime_put(&pl022->adev->dev);
> + }
We used to get warnings from checkpatch, for single line code inside {}.
Don't we
From: Chris Blair
Moves the disabling of the device and clocks to the same thread in
which the device and clocks are enabled. This avoids SMP issues where
the device can be enabled for a transfer by one thread and then
disabled by the completion of the previous transfer in another thread.
Signed
