Hi Grant,
On Friday 16 December 2011 17:59:20 Grant Likely wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Wednesday 14 December 2011 00:45:20 Grant Likely wrote:
> >> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 01:15:06AM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >> > Device are added as children of
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> On Wednesday 14 December 2011 00:45:20 Grant Likely wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 01:15:06AM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> > Device are added as children of the bus master's parent device, but
>> > spi_unregister_mast
Hi Grant,
On Wednesday 14 December 2011 00:45:20 Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 01:15:06AM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Device are added as children of the bus master's parent device, but
> > spi_unregister_master() looks for devices to unregister in the bus
> > master's child
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 01:15:06AM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Device are added as children of the bus master's parent device, but
> spi_unregister_master() looks for devices to unregister in the bus
> master's children. This results in the child devices not being
> unregistered.
>
> Fix this
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> Device are added as children of the bus master's parent device, but
> spi_unregister_master() looks for devices to unregister in the bus
> master's children. This results in the child devices not being
> unregistered.
>
> Fix this by regi
Device are added as children of the bus master's parent device, but
spi_unregister_master() looks for devices to unregister in the bus
master's children. This results in the child devices not being
unregistered.
Fix this by registering devices as direct children of the bus master.
Signed-off-by:
