Thanks, will send a corrected version.
Yonit.
On 01/18/2012 04:41 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 06:15:08PM +0200, Yonit Halperin wrote:
Set the default sizes to be the same as in the old linux spice client.
cache_size=20M pixels (instead of 32M), window_size=8M pixels for a 64MB
Set the default sizes to be the same as in the old linux spice client.
cache_size=20M pixels (instead of 32M), window_size=8M pixels for a 64MB
dev ram (instead of 16M pixels).
---
gtk/channel-display-priv.h |2 -
gtk/channel-display.c | 22 +++---
gtk/channel-main.c |1
This options will help us tune and find the optimal values.
---
gtk/spice-option.c | 10 ++
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gtk/spice-option.c b/gtk/spice-option.c
index 394a07d..d466f94 100644
--- a/gtk/spice-option.c
+++ b/gtk/spice-option.c
@@ -36,6
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 02:10:02PM -0600, Dan McGee wrote:
From: Nahum Shalman nshalman-git...@elys.com
dc7855967f4e did this for the TCP_NODELAY and IP_TOS calls; we should do
it for priority as well if necessary.
We also #ifdef the setting of the low-level socket priority based on
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 02:10:01PM -0600, Dan McGee wrote:
output to send a SIGIO signal to the running program. However, we don't
handle this signal anywhere in the code, so setting the option is
unnecessary.
ACK.
I can't find anything explaining why this why done - seems you are right
Le 20/01/2012 20:04, Yaniv Kaul a écrit :
- Original Message -
samplespcntfunctionDSO
3796.0060.4%hashlittle
This sucks, unfortunately I don't have any quick fix for it. It's the
hash computation done on each image. Needless to say it needs to be
optimized
Le 22/01/2012 15:46, Alon Levy a écrit :
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 03:18:14PM +0100, Dominique Rodrigues wrote:
Le 20/01/2012 20:04, Yaniv Kaul a écrit :
- Original Message -
samplespcntfunctionDSO
3796.0060.4%hashlittle
This sucks, unfortunately I don't
Le 22/01/2012 16:00, Alon Levy a écrit :
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 02:04:47PM -0500, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
- Original Message -
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:59:45AM +0100, Dominique Rodrigues wrote:
Le 18/01/2012 11:48, Alon Levy a écrit :
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:39:13AM +0100, Dominique
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 05:15:42PM +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 03:53:40PM +0100, Dominique Rodrigues wrote:
Le 22/01/2012 16:00, Alon Levy a écrit :
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 02:04:47PM -0500, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
- Original Message -
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at
Le 22/01/2012 18:28, Alon Levy a écrit :
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 05:15:42PM +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 03:53:40PM +0100, Dominique Rodrigues wrote:
Le 22/01/2012 16:00, Alon Levy a écrit :
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 02:04:47PM -0500, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
- Original
Le 22/01/2012 15:52, Dominique Rodrigues a écrit :
Le 22/01/2012 15:46, Alon Levy a écrit :
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 03:18:14PM +0100, Dominique Rodrigues wrote:
Le 20/01/2012 20:04, Yaniv Kaul a écrit :
- Original Message -
samplespcntfunctionDSO
3796.0060.4%
Le 22/01/2012 19:39, Dominique Rodrigues a écrit :
Le 22/01/2012 15:52, Dominique Rodrigues a écrit :
Le 22/01/2012 15:46, Alon Levy a écrit :
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 03:18:14PM +0100, Dominique Rodrigues wrote:
Le 20/01/2012 20:04, Yaniv Kaul a écrit :
- Original Message -
samples
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 06:33:59PM +0100, Dominique Rodrigues wrote:
Le 22/01/2012 18:28, Alon Levy a écrit :
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 05:15:42PM +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 03:53:40PM +0100, Dominique Rodrigues wrote:
Le 22/01/2012 16:00, Alon Levy a écrit :
On Fri, Jan
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 11:03:47PM +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 06:33:59PM +0100, Dominique Rodrigues wrote:
Le 22/01/2012 18:28, Alon Levy a écrit :
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 05:15:42PM +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 03:53:40PM +0100, Dominique
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 07:39:39PM +0100, Dominique Rodrigues wrote:
Le 22/01/2012 15:52, Dominique Rodrigues a écrit :
Le 22/01/2012 15:46, Alon Levy a écrit :
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 03:18:14PM +0100, Dominique Rodrigues wrote:
Le 20/01/2012 20:04, Yaniv Kaul a écrit :
- Original
Le 22/01/2012 22:36, Alon Levy a écrit :
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 11:03:47PM +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 06:33:59PM +0100, Dominique Rodrigues wrote:
Le 22/01/2012 18:28, Alon Levy a écrit :
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 05:15:42PM +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at
See http://code.google.com/p/smhasher/wiki/MurmurHash3
Performance quotes from there are 2.5 times what lookup3 can do, for
32 bit variant, which is what we use:
Lookup3_x86_32 - 1234 mb/sec
Lookup3_x64_32 - 1265 mb/sec
MurmurHash3_x86_32 - 3105 mb/sec
New files are released to
17 matches
Mail list logo
