Re: [Spice-devel] xf86-video-qxl performance

2012-05-23 Thread Alon Levy
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:02:03PM -0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > Hi > > - Mensaje original - > > Also, as a crazy idea, has anyone considered implementing a pure > > streaming video driver? That is, what if we had a frame buffer > > driver, > > and then a thread that fired 29 times a

Re: [Spice-devel] xf86-video-qxl performance

2012-05-23 Thread Alon Levy
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 03:20:21PM -0500, Jeremy White wrote: > I need to improve the performance of the xf86-video-qxl driver; aka > xspice; by a fairly substantial margin. > > I've set up a test case - LibreOffice over an 80 ms latency connection - > that demonstrates that it's got quite a long

Re: [Spice-devel] Precompiled win32 spice-gtk and/or remote-viewer client

2012-05-23 Thread Marc-André Lureau
Hola > Thanks for the reply. Some time ago I built the spice-gtk client on > fedora using mingw32. Since we'll have to ship a custom installer > (which > sets up the procol handler for 'spice://' style (see > http://www.foss-cloud.org/en/index.php/Protocol_Handler_Spice ) I'll > probably have to s

Re: [Spice-devel] xf86-video-qxl performance

2012-05-23 Thread Marc-André Lureau
Hi - Mensaje original - > Also, as a crazy idea, has anyone considered implementing a pure > streaming video driver? That is, what if we had a frame buffer > driver, > and then a thread that fired 29 times a second to drive a theora or > vp8 > encoder, simply feeding the current frame at

[Spice-devel] xf86-video-qxl performance

2012-05-23 Thread Jeremy White
I need to improve the performance of the xf86-video-qxl driver; aka xspice; by a fairly substantial margin. I've set up a test case - LibreOffice over an 80 ms latency connection - that demonstrates that it's got quite a long way to go. (The current case appears to suffer from an excessive set of