Re: [RFC] PCI: add CONFIG_MMU dependency

2025-04-08 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
people from disabling MMU support on a system that has both a PCI bus and an MMU. But other people may not agree, or care? Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with te

Re: [PATCH v3 02/25] drm/dumb-buffers: Provide helper to set pitch and size

2025-02-24 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
pp, but that is using bitplanes. There is already some sort of consensus to not expose bitplanes to userspace in DRM, so limiting to 1, 2, 4, and 8 bpp (which can be converted from C[1248]) is fine. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's

Re: [PATCH v3 02/25] drm/dumb-buffers: Provide helper to set pitch and size

2025-02-19 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
--+++ > + * | 2 | * DRM_FORMAT_C2 | * DRM_FORMAT_R2 | > + * ++++ > + * | 1 | * DRM_FORMAT_C1 | * DRM_FORMAT_R1 | > + * +-

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] drm/connector: make mode_valid() callback accept const mode pointer

2025-01-21 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Dmitry, CC sfr On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 11:44 AM Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 at 11:13, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 12:31 PM Dmitry Baryshkov > > wrote: > > > On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 15:37:04 +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] drm/connector: make mode_valid() callback accept const mode pointer

2025-01-21 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
misc/drm-misc-next' into drm-tip"). What am I missing? Thanks! P.S. Sima: noticed while resolving a merge conflict using drm-tip. Thx! Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org In p

Re: [PATCH v2 25/25] drm/xlnx: Compute dumb-buffer sizes with drm_mode_size_dumb()

2025-01-17 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
gt; for a very long time on those platforms. > > I tried to look around, but I did not find any mentions that CREATE_DUMB > should only be used for RGB buffers. Is anyone outside the core > developers even aware of it? > > If we don't use dumb buffers there, where do w

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH RFC v1 00/52] drm/crtc: Rename struct drm_crtc::dev to drm_dev

2023-07-13 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
uot; | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | > head -20 > 38494 struct device *dev > 16388 struct net_device *dev >4184 struct drm_device *dev >2780 struct pci_dev *dev >1916 struct comedi_device *dev >1510 struct mlx5_core_dev *dev > 1057 struct mlx4_dev *dev

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH RFC v1 00/52] drm/crtc: Rename struct drm_crtc::dev to drm_dev

2023-07-13 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
in the shmob_drm-specific subclasses of drm_{crtc,connector,plane} to "base". https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/b3daca80f82625ba14e3aeaf2fca6dcefa056e47.1687423204.git.geert+rene...@glider.be > Also the functions that deal with both a struct device and a struct > drm_device ofte