On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 02:10:01PM -0600, Dan McGee wrote:
> output to send a SIGIO signal to the running program. However, we don't
> handle this signal anywhere in the code, so setting the option is
> unnecessary.
>
ACK.
I can't find anything explaining why this why done - seems you are right
This looks like a good catch to me, but I would
like to see a review by someone who knows this code a bit
better then me. Alon ? Yonit?
Regards,
Hans
On 01/19/2012 09:10 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
output to send a SIGIO signal to the running program. However, we don't
handle this signal anywhere in
output to send a SIGIO signal to the running program. However, we don't
handle this signal anywhere in the code, so setting the option is
unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee
---
Sorry, botched the sending of this patch it looks like, trying again...
If anyone knows more about O_ASYNC than I d
output to send a SIGIO signal to the running program. However, we don't
handle this signal anywhere in the code, so setting the option is
unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee
---
If anyone knows more about O_ASYNC than I do, please speak up, but doing some
reading and research leads me to belie
