On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 05:11:33PM +0200, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> This patch will replace the common/ directory with the spice-common
> project. It is for now a simple project subdirectory shared with
> spice-gtk, but the goal is to make it a proper library later on.
>
> With this change, the s
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
> tarball is not an option IMO. We want windows development to be as easy
> as linux development, and that means git. But what's the problem? it
> will work just the same, vcproj changes etc.
That was a suggestion. Imho, we should even go further
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 05:51:56PM +0200, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
> > tarball is not an option IMO. We want windows development to be as easy
> > as linux development, and that means git. But what's the problem? it
> > will work just the same, v
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 05:11:33PM +0200, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> This patch will replace the common/ directory with the spice-common
> project. It is for now a simple project subdirectory shared with
> spice-gtk, but the goal is to make it a proper library later on.
>
> With this change, the s
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
> Other then that, and with a suitable Visual Studio fix, ACK.
What do you mean by Visual Studio fix? I said I left that part out
intentionally. It's already quite some work to deal with one (that is
more capable anyway).
--
Marc-André Lureau
__
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 06:46:56PM +0200, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
> > Other then that, and with a suitable Visual Studio fix, ACK.
>
> What do you mean by Visual Studio fix? I said I left that part out
> intentionally. It's already quite some w
