On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 09:55:21AM +0300, Yonit Halperin wrote:
On 07/07/2011 07:33 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
used to move dirty rectangle notification from update_area to
surface_updated.
This is RfC quality. Specifically where to call surface_updated. Currently I
only call it from stop. This
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 01:48:38PM +0300, Alon Levy wrote:
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 09:55:21AM +0300, Yonit Halperin wrote:
On 07/07/2011 07:33 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
used to move dirty rectangle notification from update_area to
surface_updated.
This is RfC quality. Specifically where to
On 07/07/2011 07:33 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
used to move dirty rectangle notification from update_area to surface_updated.
This is RfC quality. Specifically where to call surface_updated. Currently I
only call it from stop. This should be good enough for migration, which is
the only use case I
On 07/07/11 18:33, Alon Levy wrote:
This is RfC quality. Specifically where to call surface_updated. Currently I
only call it from stop. This should be good enough for migration, which is
the only use case I think. This means after stop qemu is guranteed to know
the dirty regions of all
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 08:41:22AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On 07/07/11 18:33, Alon Levy wrote:
This is RfC quality. Specifically where to call surface_updated. Currently I
only call it from stop. This should be good enough for migration, which is
the only use case I think. This means after
On 07/08/11 09:47, Alon Levy wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 08:41:22AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On 07/07/11 18:33, Alon Levy wrote:
This is RfC quality. Specifically where to call surface_updated. Currently I
only call it from stop. This should be good enough for migration, which is
the
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 10:05:19AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On 07/08/11 09:47, Alon Levy wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 08:41:22AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On 07/07/11 18:33, Alon Levy wrote:
This is RfC quality. Specifically where to call surface_updated. Currently
I
only call it
BTW: wasn't the plan to remove the rect args from update_area_async?
I thought the idea was just to remove the dirty rects, not the actual
rect the guest wants updated. This patch removes the former.
Ah, ok. Yes, plan was to zap just the dirty rects.
cheers,
Gerd
used to move dirty rectangle notification from update_area to surface_updated.
This is RfC quality. Specifically where to call surface_updated. Currently I
only call it from stop. This should be good enough for migration, which is
the only use case I think. This means after stop qemu is guranteed
