On Fri, 2017-04-28 at 05:55 -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2017-04-27 at 15:20 -0500, Jonathon Jongsma wrote:
> > > Previously, if the user attempted to transfer a file that had the
> > > same
> > > name as a file that already exists on the guest, we would just
> > > fail
> > > the
>
> On Thu, 2017-04-27 at 15:20 -0500, Jonathon Jongsma wrote:
> > Previously, if the user attempted to transfer a file that had the
> > same
> > name as a file that already exists on the guest, we would just fail
> > the
> > transfer. This patch tries to match the behavior of the linux
> > vdagen
On Thu, 2017-04-27 at 15:20 -0500, Jonathon Jongsma wrote:
> Previously, if the user attempted to transfer a file that had the
> same
> name as a file that already exists on the guest, we would just fail
> the
> transfer. This patch tries to match the behavior of the linux
> vdagent
> where we try
Previously, if the user attempted to transfer a file that had the same
name as a file that already exists on the guest, we would just fail the
transfer. This patch tries to match the behavior of the linux vdagent
where we try to append an integer onto the name of the new file to make
it unique. For
