Hi,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 02:00:23PM +0200, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> ack
Thanks, pushed
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Victor Toso wrote:
> > This is a minor fix in the logic as in both situations (with or
> > without the patch) the reference count for the SpiceFileTransferTask
> > ob
ack
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Victor Toso wrote:
> This is a minor fix in the logic as in both situations (with or
> without the patch) the reference count for the SpiceFileTransferTask
> object is the same.
>
> The change is interesting as SpiceFileTransferTask is created but on
> g_file_
This is a minor fix in the logic as in both situations (with or
without the patch) the reference count for the SpiceFileTransferTask
object is the same.
The change is interesting as SpiceFileTransferTask is created but on
g_file_read_async() it increases its reference count while
c->file_xfer_task
