Hi,
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:33:56PM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> Seems that GTask heuristic only makes sense in a non-coroutine case.
> After opening a bug[0] on spice-gtk and a few discussions in the mailing
[0] ?
> list, seems that is completely fine for coroutine code to deal with the
Pushed, thanks!
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:01 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:57 PM, Marc-André Lureau
> wrote:
>> ack
>>
>> - Original Message -
>>> Seems that GTask heuristic only makes sense in a non-coroutine case.
>>> After opening a bug[0] on spice-gtk and
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:57 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> ack
>
> - Original Message -
>> Seems that GTask heuristic only makes sense in a non-coroutine case.
>> After opening a bug[0] on spice-gtk and a few discussions in the mailing
>> list, seems that is completely fine for coroutine
ack
- Original Message -
> Seems that GTask heuristic only makes sense in a non-coroutine case.
> After opening a bug[0] on spice-gtk and a few discussions in the mailing
> list, seems that is completely fine for coroutine code to deal with the
> idle explicitly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabian
Seems that GTask heuristic only makes sense in a non-coroutine case.
After opening a bug[0] on spice-gtk and a few discussions in the mailing
list, seems that is completely fine for coroutine code to deal with the
idle explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio
---
Changes since v2, as per Marc-
